User Tools

Site Tools


en:intro

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
en:intro [2018/01/09 17:39]
ashley
en:intro [2019/12/16 15:28]
golikov
Line 1: Line 1:
-The creation of space-rocket hardware (SRH) is a complex process that requires the intellectual work of many specialists:​ scientists, designers, radio mechanics, technologists,​ programmers,​ electronics engineers, and representatives of many other specialties. SRH is at the forefront of new technologies,​ and thus it dictates the special requirements for the level of training of future specialists within this industry.+===== Philosophy =====
  
-In countries with developed economies, ​this project approach ​is used for learning purposes to train specialists. Students ​in higher education institutions and even high schools with the help of tutors (practitioners) can create their own small satellites ​weighing ​1-3 kg for educational purposes. ​Such CubeSats ​(the word CubeSat is an acknowledged ​ {{http://​www.cubesat.org|standard}} for small educational satellitesare launched ​with help of the government either ​together with professional-grade ​satellites ​on large rockets ​or by cosmonauts from the ISSThere are also other options for launching students satellites, such as launches on non-professional rockets to heights of 2-3 km ({{http://​roscansat.com |CanSat}} movement), launches on {{http://​nearspace.ru |aerostats}} to heights of 30-50 km, or carrying out experiments on board of ISS in {{http://​ssl.mit.edu/​spheres | zero gravity}}. The role of such experiments cannot be overestimated – try it and you will understand for yourself!+Aerospace vehicle engineering is a complex field requiring intellectual input from multiple specialists:​ scientists, designers, radio engineers, process engineers, programmers,​ electronics developers and experts from many other vocations. The space industry is always at the forefront of new technologies,​ setting an exceptional bar on the skill level of tomorrow’s experts in this industry. 
 +In developed economies, ​training relies on so-called ​project approach ​whereby a university or even a secondary school enables their students – supervised by experts ​in the field – to design miniature ​satellites ​between ​and 3 kg in weight ​for educational purposes. ​These satellites, known as CubeSats, are a globally accepted ​standard for very small-scale ​educational satellites. With government funding they are then launched ​into the space together with other, “professional” satellites ​– either in the traditional manner using a rocket, ​or by astronauts aboard ​the International Space Station.
  
-In Russia the educational process is traditionally rather conservative. We use approaches from the previous century. Despite attempts to reverse the situation exclusive Russian approach for training engineers which combine practical and theoretical classes used to be in Bauman Technical University but remained in the Soviet past. On the practice educational satellites are very rare. No team wants to have students and especially pupils in real space projects. There is an understanding that modern approaches should be added in education first in school and then in higher educational institution as it is done in Moscow Polytechnic University and some other educational institutes. ​ 
  
-We suppose that training of future engineers should be started from school bench. We should involve pupils in practical work with hardware which will give them an idea of how real satellite works. To do that we propose an instrument – construction set OrbiCraft. It is a real construction set for spacecraft functional model assembly. This set includes following componentsframe, orientation sensors, executive elements, cable network, software and payload. It will show students design process, assembly, tests and exploitation of spacecrafts in visual form. At the end it will allow students to design, test, launch ​and exploit in “space” (on the special laboratory stand) may be very simple but their own “spacecraft”.+{{:siriussat-1-rs13s-and-siriussat-2-rs14s-cubesats.jpg?400|}}
  
-In fact the result ​of such education ​should ​be skills and knowledge which will allow students to take meaningful part in design and launch ​projects of real small spacecrafts ​CubeSats” (satellite weighing 1 kg with full set of essential sensors ​and systems ​for working ​in space)Specialists ​with real experience in such projects ​will be required in rocket science ​to work with interesting projects on positions of great trust.+We share the belief that training ​of tomorrow’s engineers ​should ​start from the school by actively involving them in hands-on experience with hardware that lets them know how real-world satellites operate. To that end we have come forward with a tool – the Orbicraft construction set. This is a real DIY kit for assembling functional models of space satellites. The set has all the components that will let kids understand spacecraft ​design, assembly, testing ​and operation processes systemically in an instructive manner, ultimately enabling them to come up with a simple yet their own “orbiter” that they will design, test, launch ​and operate in space” (on a dedicated laboratory setup). 
 + 
 +{{:​orbicraft-deti.jpg?​400|}} ​  
 + 
 +Such training should bear the fruit of knowledge ​and skills that will prepare kids for sensible future involvement ​in the design and launch of real small-scale spacecraftSkills gained ​with electronics and programming ​will also let students apply their talent ​to neighboring engineering fields such as robotics, UAVs etc.
  
en/intro.txt · Last modified: 2020/03/25 16:28 (external edit)